Austin EV charging use: where a charging site is permitted outright
Principal use only — a charger in a car park is not this
The first two subsections do all the scoping, and they are worth reading before anything else. §25-2-820 applies to electric vehicle charging as a principal use, and expressly does not apply to it as an accessory use.
So this is the rulebook for a charging site — a lot whose reason for existing is charging vehicles. Chargers in the car park of a supermarket, an office or a block of flats are accessory to those uses and none of the distances, size caps or roadway tests below reach them.
The old filling station has its own route in
Subsection (F) is a separate path from everything that follows, and the easiest one to satisfy. On a site with a commercial or industrial base district, charging is a permitted use where there is:
- an existing service station use; or
- a discontinued service station use — provided no later use of the site included a restaurant (general), restaurant (limited) or residential use.
No roadway test, no separation distance, no size cap, and any commercial or industrial district rather than only the seven listed later. The logic is plain enough: the site already sold fuel to vehicles.
The condition on the discontinued case is what stops a former station that has since become a café or a home being pulled back into a vehicle use.
| Roadway the site front- or side-faces | Outcome on a CS, CS-1, CH, IP, MI, LI or R&D site |
|---|---|
| Core transit corridor · future core transit corridor · urban roadway | Permitted — but only if ≥1,000 ft from another charging site and the site is ≤25,000 sq ft |
| Suburban roadway · highway · hill country roadway · internal circulation route | Permitted, with no separation or size condition |
| Any other adopted roadway type | Conditional use |
| Within 1,000 ft of a highway cap or stitch | Conditional use |
§25-2-820(G) to (J). Distance is measured lot line to lot line.
The urban corridors are the harder ones, not the easier
The table repays a second look, because the conditions sit where you might not expect them. On a suburban roadway, highway, hill country roadway or internal circulation route, charging is permitted with no separation requirement and no size cap.
On a core transit corridor, future core transit corridor or urban roadway — the streets the city is otherwise densifying — it is permitted only if the site sits at least 1,000 feet from another charging site and is 25,000 square feet or less.
Both conditions point the same way. On the corridors where land is most contested, a charging site may be small and may not cluster; out on the highways it may be as large as the lot allows and sit next door to another.
Highway caps and stitches pull a site into conditional use
The last limb of §25-2-820(J) is the most obviously current thing in the section: a site within 1,000 feet of a highway cap or stitch is a conditional use, whatever roadway it faces.
A cap or stitch is a deck built over a sunken motorway to carry public space across it. Land beside one is about to become something quite different from land beside an open trench, and the section holds charging sites there to a discretionary review rather than letting them establish by right in the meantime.
One level below ground, and no further
§25-2-820(E) is a single line that decides a lot of garage design: charging stations may be located one level below ground and above.
So the first basement level is available and the second is not. In a multi-storey structure the whole above-grade stack is fine; it is the deep basement that the section closes off.
Common questions
Send us an address and we will tell you what we find
We do this research ourselves on every project we take on — zoning, floodplain, watershed, trees, whether it is a legal lot. Send us an address and we will run it and tell you what we find. It works the same whether you own a vacant lot, a house you are thinking of adding a unit to, or a house you are thinking of replacing. No charge and no strings, and if it is a bad lot we will say so.
Send us an addressWe are homebuilders, not the City of Austin. This page explains how we read the code in practice — it is not legal advice and it is not an official determination. Always confirm with Austin Development Services before you rely on it for a project. The authoritative text is the Austin Land Development Code; permitting questions go to Austin Development Services Department.