Austin density bonus districts: DB90, ETOD, DBETOD and DBCS
All four make the same bargain
Austin has four density bonus combining districts. They sit on top of a base district rather than replacing it, and each offers development capacity in return for reserved affordable units:
- DB90 — 30 ft above the base district, capped at 90 ft.
- ETOD — equitable transit-oriented development, the underlying transit district.
- DBETOD — the density bonus that rides on ETOD, with a height ladder.
- DBCS — density bonus creative spaces, trading for affordable creative space rather than housing.
None of them is automatic. Each requires the zoning to include the district and the applicant to meet the affordability commitments under Chapter 4-18.
DB90 — thirty feet, capped at ninety
The height offer is simple: 30 feet above whatever the base district allows, but never above 90 feet. On a base district already at 60 ft or more, the cap bites before the bonus is exhausted.
What it costs depends on tenure:
- For sale — at least 12% of units affordable to households at 80% or less of Austin-Round Rock median family income. An owner-occupied development may elect to meet this without providing income-restricted units on site.
- For rent — at least 12% at 60% MFI or less, and at least 10% at 50% MFI or less. Both, not either.
There is a ground-floor obligation too: at least 75% of the building frontage along the principal street must be pedestrian-oriented commercial and civic space.
DBETOD — a ladder, priced by rung
This is the most legible of the four, because the trade is explicit at each level. DBETOD may only be combined with ETOD — it cannot stand alone.
| Height sought | Affordable at 60% MFI | Affordable at 50% MFI |
|---|---|---|
| 60 ft or any non-height standard | 10% minimum | — |
| 90 ft | 12% minimum | 10% minimum |
| 120 ft | 15% minimum | 12% minimum |
DBETOD under §25-2-654. Percentages are of residential units, and the two columns at 90 ft and 120 ft are cumulative requirements rather than alternatives. Median family income is the current Austin-Round Rock figure.
Where ETOD cannot go
§25-2-653(C) bars an ETOD combining district from being applied over any special purpose base district, and specifically over Lake Austin (LA), rural residence (RR) and single-family residence large lot (SF-1).
The pattern is consistent — the transit program is kept off the lowest-density and most environmentally sensitive districts.
DBCS — the one that is not about housing
Density bonus creative spaces trades development capacity for affordable creative space and the preservation of existing non-residential space, rather than for dwelling units.
It is the smallest of the four programs and the least likely to touch a residential project, but it shares the same structure: the zoning must include the district, and the reservations run through Chapter 4-18.
How we read a density bonus site
Start with the base district, because DB90's offer is relative. Thirty feet on top of a 40 ft district is a real gain; on a district already at 60 ft or more, the 90 ft cap means you are buying less than the headline suggests.
On DBETOD, work the ladder backwards from the unit mix rather than forwards from the height. The jump from 90 ft to 120 ft costs three points at 60% MFI and two at 50% — decide whether the extra stories carry that before designing to them.
And check the conflict rule. Three of these four override conflicting provisions outright; ETOD does not where the other provision is stricter. That single clause can change which compatibility or setback rule actually governs.
Common questions
Send us an address and we will tell you what we find
We do this research ourselves on every project we take on — zoning, floodplain, watershed, trees, whether it is a legal lot. Send us an address and we will run it and tell you what we find. It works the same whether you own a vacant lot, a house you are thinking of adding a unit to, or a house you are thinking of replacing. No charge and no strings, and if it is a bad lot we will say so.
Send us an addressWe are homebuilders, not the City of Austin. This page explains how we read the code in practice — it is not legal advice and it is not an official determination. Always confirm with Austin Development Services before you rely on it for a project. The authoritative text is the Austin Land Development Code; permitting questions go to Austin Development Services Department.