Austin MF zoning explained: MF-1 through MF-6 density and standards
| District | Designation text | Minimum site area per unit | Implied units/acre |
|---|---|---|---|
| MF-1 | Up to 17 units per acre | 2,500–3,500 sq ft | 17.4 |
| MF-2 | Up to 23 units per acre | 1,600–2,400 sq ft | 27.2† |
| MF-3 | Up to 36 units per acre | 1,200–1,800 sq ft | 36.3 |
| MF-4 | 36 to 54 units per acre | 800–1,200 sq ft | 36.3–54.5 |
| MF-5 | Up to 54 units per acre | 800–1,200 sq ft | 54.5 |
| MF-6 | Names no density | — none set | — none set |
Designation text is from §§25-2-62 to 25-2-66; minimum site area per unit is from §§25-2-560 to 25-2-563. The designation text and the site area schedule reconcile for every district except MF-2. MF-6 sets no per-unit figure at all. † MF-2 is the one district where they disagree, and the code does not say which wins. §25-2-63 names 23 units per acre expressly; the 27.2 is only worked back from a minimum site area. We design to 23, as our practice rather than a stated rule.
There is no units-per-acre limit in the code
This is the thing that trips people up. If you go looking for "the MF-3 density limit" expecting a number of units per acre, you will not find one in the regulations. What §§25-2-560 to 25-2-563 actually set is a minimum site area for each dwelling unit — and it changes with the number of bedrooms.
So the density of an MF site is not a property of the zoning alone. It is a property of the zoning and the unit mix you choose. Build efficiencies and you fit far more units than the headline figure suggests; build three-bedroom family units and you fit noticeably fewer.
The arithmetic is simply site area divided by the per-unit minimum, rounded down.
| District | Efficiency | One bedroom | Two or more bedrooms |
|---|---|---|---|
| MF-1 §25-2-560 | 2,500 (17.4/acre) | 3,000 (14.5/acre) | 3,500 (12.4/acre) |
| MF-2 §25-2-561 | 1,600 (27.2/acre†) | 2,000 (21.8/acre) | 2,400 (18.2/acre) |
| MF-3 §25-2-562 | 1,200 (36.3/acre) | 1,500 (29/acre) | 1,800 (24.2/acre) |
| MF-4 §25-2-563 | 800 (54.5/acre) | 1,000 (43.6/acre) | 1,200 (36.3/acre) |
| MF-5 §25-2-563 | 800 (54.5/acre) | 1,000 (43.6/acre) | 1,200 (36.3/acre) |
| MF-6 | none set | none set | none set |
Minimum site area per dwelling unit, in square feet, from §§25-2-560 to 25-2-563. The units-per-acre figures in brackets are derived from those areas — the code does not state them. MF-4 and MF-5 share one schedule because §25-2-563 covers both. † MF-2 is the one district where the two disagree, and the code does not say which wins. §25-2-63 names 23 units per acre for MF-2 in its own words; the 27.2 is only arithmetic worked back from a minimum site area. We design to 23 — the expressly stated figure — but that is our practice, not a rule the code states.
| Standard | MF-1 | MF-2 | MF-3 | MF-4 | MF-5 | MF-6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Min lot size | 8,000 | 8,000 | 8,000 | 8,000 | 8,000 | 8,000 |
| Min lot width | 50 ft | 50 ft | 50 ft | 50 ft | 50 ft | 50 ft |
| Max height | 40 ft | 40 ft or 3 stories | 40 ft | 60 ft | 60 ft | 90 ft |
| Front setback | 25 ft | 25 ft | 25 ft | 15 ft | 15 ft | 15 ft |
| Street side | 15 ft | 15 ft | 15 ft | 15 ft | 15 ft | 15 ft |
| Interior side | 5 ft | 5 ft | 5 ft | 5 ft | 5 ft | 5 ft |
| Rear | 10 ft | 10 ft | 10 ft | 10 ft | 10 ft | 10 ft |
| Building coverage | 45% | 50% | 55% | 60% | 60% | 70% |
| Impervious cover | 55% | 60% | 65% | 70% | 70% | 80% |
| Floor-to-area ratio | none | none | 0.75:1 | 0.75:1 | 1:1 | none |
From the §25-2-492 site development regulations table. Note the front setback drops from 25 ft to 15 ft between MF-3 and MF-4, and that FAR only appears in the middle of the range — MF-1, MF-2 and MF-6 have no floor-to-area ratio at all.
MF-1
The least dense multifamily district. §25-2-560(B) sets 2,500 to 3,500 sq ft of minimum site area per unit, depending on bedroom count, and the district caps out at 40 ft in height with 45% building coverage. Its "up to 17 units per acre" designation is one of the four MF designations that reconciles cleanly with the schedule.
Run a specific lot through the density calculator above to see the unit count that implies.
MF-3
§25-2-562(B) sets 1,200 to 1,800 sq ft of minimum site area per unit, a 40 ft height limit applies, and — unlike MF-1 and MF-2 — a 0.75:1 floor-to-area ratio caps the building as well. Its "up to 36 units per acre" designation matches the schedule's efficiency-unit row exactly.
See the density calculator above for a specific lot — MF-2 is the one MF district where that same arithmetic does not reconcile.
MF-4
MF-4 shares its 800 to 1,200 sq ft minimum site area per unit with MF-5, under §25-2-563(B), and is where the front setback drops from 25 ft to 15 ft. Its designation — "36 to 54 units per acre" — is the only one stated as a range, and both ends match the schedule's two-or-more-bedroom and efficiency rows exactly.
Compute a specific lot with the density calculator above.
MF-5
MF-5 uses the same 800 to 1,200 sq ft schedule as MF-4 (§25-2-563(B)) but carries the highest floor-to-area ratio of any MF district with one at all — 1:1 against MF-4's 0.75:1 — plus 60% building coverage. Its "up to 54 units per acre" designation matches the schedule's efficiency-unit row.
Try a specific lot with the density calculator above.
MF-6 is the outlier in both directions
Every other MF district is bounded by a minimum site area per unit. MF-6 is not — no section sets one, and its designation names no density figure either. It has no floor-to-area ratio. What actually bounds an MF-6 building is the envelope alone: the 90-foot height limit, 70% building coverage, 80% impervious cover and the setbacks — the most permissive residential envelope in the code.
Getting MF-6 standards on MF-2 to MF-5 land
Property zoned MF-2 through MF-5 can sometimes reach MF-6's more generous coverage and density numbers under an older affordability incentive, §25-2-567. It does not raise the height cap — that stays governed by the underlying district.
Where the code contradicts itself: MF-2
Four of the five density-bearing MF designations reconcile cleanly with their site area schedule: MF-1, MF-3, MF-4 and MF-5 all match the schedule within rounding. MF-2 does not — §25-2-63 says "up to 23 units per acre," but §25-2-561's efficiency-unit minimum implies 27.2. We design to the stricter figure, 23 — it governs. For a one-bedroom or two-bedroom scheme the schedule is already below 23 anyway, so the gap only matters for an all-efficiency building; the 27.2 figure is an artifact of that one schedule row, not usable capacity.
What we check first on MF land
Unit mix, before anything else. The density table is the whole project on an MF site, and the difference between an efficiency-heavy and a family-unit scheme is the difference between two quite different buildings on the same dirt.
Then the front setback step between MF-3 and MF-4. Twenty-five feet to fifteen sounds small; on a shallow site it is often the difference between one bay of parking and none, and it moves the building forward enough to change how the street reads.
Then compatibility. These base numbers are the start of the analysis, not the end — multifamily next to single-family attracts compatibility standards, and neighborhood plan overlays sit on top of both. We treat the §25-2-492 row as the ceiling before any of that is applied, never as the answer.
Common questions
Send us an address and we will tell you what we find
We do this research ourselves on every project we take on — zoning, floodplain, watershed, trees, whether it is a legal lot. Send us an address and we will run it and tell you what we find. It works the same whether you own a vacant lot, a house you are thinking of adding a unit to, or a house you are thinking of replacing. No charge and no strings, and if it is a bad lot we will say so.
Send us an addressWe are homebuilders, not the City of Austin. This page explains how we read the code in practice — it is not legal advice and it is not an official determination. Always confirm with Austin Development Services before you rely on it for a project. The authoritative text is the Austin Land Development Code; permitting questions go to Austin Development Services Department.